Hang the Banker
Follow the Money
Between 2009 and 2013, including when Mrs. Clinton was secretary of state, the Clinton Foundation received at least $8.6 million from the Victor Pinchuk Foundation, according to that foundation, which is based in Kiev, Ukraine.
It was created by Mr. Pinchuk, whose fortune stems from a pipe-making company. He served two terms as an elected member of the Ukrainian Parliament and is a proponent of closer ties between Ukraine and the European Union.
In 2008, Mr. Pinchuk made a five-year, $29 million commitment to the Clinton Global Initiative, a wing of the foundation that coordinates charitable projects and funding for them but doesnât handle the money. The pledge was to fund a program to train future Ukrainian leaders and professionals âto modernize Ukraine,â according to the Clinton Foundation. Several alumni are current members of the Ukrainian Parliament. Actual donations so far amount to only $1.8 million, a Pinchuk foundation spokesman said, citing the impact of the 2008 financial crisis.
The Pinchuk foundation said its donations were intended to help to make Ukraine âa successful, free, modern country based on European values.â
It said that if Mr. Pinchuk was lobbying the State Department about Ukraine, âthis cannot be seen as anything but a good thing.â
â From the Wall Street Journal article:Â Clinton Charity Tapped Foreign Friends
When I first came across the title to this article, I didnât think much of it. In fact, I almost didnât even click the link thinking it was just a repeat of a prior expose I highlighted in the post:Â Hillary Clinton Exposed Part 2 â Clinton Foundation Took Millions From Countries That Also Fund ISIS.
Fortunately, I did decide to take a look and pretty soon my jaw absolutely hit the floor. Although the Wall Street Journal didnât play up the connection, I was stunned to see that of all the oligarchs connected to foreign governments who donated to the Clinton Foundation while she was Secretary of State, Ukraine was at the very top.
I thought this to be strange, but as I read on I just couldnât believe how connected the main donor was to the current regime in power. Considering this is the main geopolitical hotspot on earth right now, many, many questions need to be asked.
Letâs also recall some of the more shady aspects of the new government in Ukraine by taking a look back at the post, Made in the USA â How the Ukrainian Government is Giving Away Citizenships so Foreigners Can Run the Country. Here are a few excerpts:
Claims that the new government in Ukraine is nothing more than a Western puppet Parliament have been swirling around consistently since February. Nevertheless, I think itâs very significant that the takeover is now overt, undeniable and completely out in the open. Nothing proves this fact more clearly than the recent and sudden granting of citizenship to three foreigners so that they can take top posts in the government.
At the top of the list is American, Natalie Jaresko, who runs private equity fund Horizon Capital. She will now be Ukraineâs Finance Minister, and I highly doubt she will be forced to pay the IRS Expatriation Tax (one set of laws for the rich and powerful, another set of laws for the peasants). For Economy Minister, a Lithuanian investment banker, Aivaras Abromavicius, will take the reins. Health Minister will be Alexander Kvitashvili of Georgia.
Now read the following from the WSJ:
The Clinton Foundation swore off donations from foreign governments when Hillary Clinton was secretary of state. That didnât stop the foundation from raising millions of dollars from foreigners with connections to their home governments, a review of foundation disclosures shows.
Some donors have direct ties to foreign governments. One is a member of the Saudi royal family. Another is a Ukrainian oligarch and former parliamentarian. Others are individuals with close connections to foreign governments that stem from their business activities. Their professed policy interests range from human rights to U.S.-Cuba relations.
All told, more than a dozen foreign individuals and their foundations and companies were large donors to the Clinton Foundation in the years after Mrs. Clinton became secretary of state in 2009, collectively giving between $34 million and $68 million, foundation records show. Some donors also provided funding directly to charitable projects sponsored by the foundation, valued by the organization at $60 million.
The foreign donors reached by The Wall Street Journal said they contributed to the foundation for charitable, not political reasons.
Former President Bill Clinton promised the Obama administration the foundation wouldnât accept most foreign-government donations while his wife was secretary of state. The agreement didnât place limits on donations from foreign individuals or corporations.Â
Between 2009 and 2013, including when Mrs. Clinton was secretary of state, the Clinton Foundation received at least $8.6 million from the Victor Pinchuk Foundation, according to that foundation, which is based in Kiev, Ukraine. It was created by Mr. Pinchuk, whose fortune stems from a pipe-making company. He served two terms as an elected member of the Ukrainian Parliament and is a proponent of closer ties between Ukraine and the European Union.
In 2008, Mr. Pinchuk made a five-year, $29 million commitment to the Clinton Global Initiative, a wing of the foundation that coordinates charitable projects and funding for them but doesnât handle the money. The pledge was to fund a program to train future Ukrainian leaders and professionals âto modernize Ukraine,â according to the Clinton Foundation. Several alumni are current members of the Ukrainian Parliament. Actual donations so far amount to only $1.8 million, a Pinchuk foundation spokesman said, citing the impact of the 2008 financial crisis.
During Mrs. Clintonâs time at the State Department, Mr. Schoen, the pollster, registered as a lobbyist for Mr. Pinchuk, federal records show. Mr. Schoen said he and Mr. Pinchuk met several times with Clinton aides including Melanne Verveer, a Ukrainian-American and then a State Department ambassador-at-large for global womenâs issues. The purpose, Mr. Schoen said, was to encourage the U.S. to pressure Ukraineâs then-President Viktor Yanukovych to free his jailed predecessor, Yulia Tymoshenko.
Mr. Schoen said his lobbying was unrelated to the donations. âWe were not seeking to use any leverage or any connections or anything of the sort relating to the foundation,â he said.
Please Schoen, donât piss on my leg and tell me itâs raining.
The Pinchuk foundation said its donations were intended to help to make Ukraine âa successful, free, modern country based on European values.â It said that if Mr. Pinchuk was lobbying the State Department about Ukraine, âthis cannot be seen as anything but a good thing.â
Oh certainly, all you have to do is take a brief look at Ukraine to see what a wonderful thing it has been.
The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia wasnât allowed to give to the foundation while Mrs. Clinton was at the State Department. But several prominent Saudi Arabian businessmen gave millions.
⢠Victor Dahdaleh, a London businessman whose foundation contributed between $1 million and $5 million, has ties to Bahrainâs state-owned aluminum company. He was the intermediary between the state-owned Aluminum Bahrain B.S.C. and Alcoa World Alumina, which is majority owned by Alcoa Inc. Last year, he was acquitted in London on charges of bribing Bahraini officials to secure contracts for the Alcoa firm. In the U.S., the Alcoa affiliate pleaded guilty last year to corruption charges, and the Justice Department said an investigation into the matter remains open.Â
Rilin Enterprises, part of a privately held Chinese construction, infrastructure and port-management company, made a $2 million foundation pledge. The company was founded and is run by Wang Wenliang, a member of the National Peopleâs Congress, Chinaâs formal parliamentary body. Mr. Wang didnât respond to a request to speak with him during the annual meeting earlier this month.
Mr. Wang is the former municipal official of Dandong, a city of 2.4 million in the Liaoning province on Chinaâs border with North Korea. His company now controls that cityâs port, a major trade route into North Korea.
The Clinton Foundation was unaware Mr. Wang was a delegate to the NPC, said a foundation official.
One of Mr. Wangâs firms was a contractor for the new Chinese Embassy in Washington.Â
In todayâs fraudulent and rigged oligarch economy, this is what we call a nice âreturn on cronyism.â
Also see:
Revealed: Tony Blair and the (jewish) oligarch (Viktor Pinchuk) bankrolling his charity
All content herein is owned by author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VNR, authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians, or VT Network. Some content may be satirical in nature.Â
All images within are full responsibility of the author and NOT VNR.
Read Full Policy Notice - Comment Policy
Hillary Clinton’s Two Foreign-Policy Catastrophes
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/eric-zuesse/hillary-clintons-two-fore_1_b_3714765.html
Hillary Clinton is reportedly poised to announce her candidacy for the Democratic presidential nomination this weekend. The move comes as a new investigation has revealed Clintonâs close ties to a Canadian oil company with a history of alleged violence in Colombia. The International Business Times reports while Clinton was secretary of state she backed a Colombian free trade pact she had previously opposed over concerns about labor rights, after the founder of oil giant Pacific Rubiales pledged millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation. The founder, Frank Giustra, now serves on the Clinton Foundationâs board. Labor leaders say Clinton ignored accounts of attacks on union organizers in Colombia, instead backing the trade pact which benefited Giustra and other foreign investors.
Comments are closed.